August 13, 2026
Buyers who have closed on a home in Vail tend to arrive in Beaver Creek thinking they already understand the paperwork. They ask the title company for the transfer tax line and expect something close to Vail's familiar one percent. Then the number comes back more than double that, and it isn't coming from a town at all.
Beaver Creek doesn't have a mayor, a town council, or a municipal code to search. It sits inside unincorporated Eagle County, run instead by a private nonprofit called the Beaver Creek Resort Company, which formed as a Colorado nonprofit corporation because Beaver Creek is not a municipality but a part of unincorporated Eagle County. That distinction matters more than it sounds like it should, because the absence of a government doesn't mean the absence of a transfer fee. It means the fee lives somewhere buyers don't think to look until it's already on the closing statement.
Vail's transfer tax is about as public as a local ordinance gets. The Town of Vail created its 1% Real Estate Transfer Tax in 1980, with funds restricted by ordinance for acquiring, maintaining and improving local property for parks, recreation, open space and sustainable environmental practices. It wasn't even the town's first instinct. Vail voters rejected a proposed 1% transfer tax in an April 1978 ballot measure by a vote of 69 to 101, and rather than send it back to voters, the town council established the tax itself by a 6-1 vote in July 1979. A later attempt to raise it hit a wall: the council capped RETT at 1% in 1987, a cap that became permanent once the TABOR Amendment made it unconstitutional for the town to raise the tax further. Every dollar of it is tracked on a page any buyer can find on vail.gov.
Beaver Creek Village runs on a different rate collected by a different kind of entity. The Beaver Creek Resort Company collects a Real Estate Transfer Assessment equal to 2.375% of fair market value on every real estate sale in Beaver Creek, and even deeds transferred for no money still have to file paperwork acknowledging it. Quit claim deeds or special warranty deeds executed for zero consideration are required to submit a formal RETA exemption form. Run the same round number through both towns and the gap stops being academic. On a $3 million sale, Vail's 1% comes to $30,000. Beaver Creek Village's 2.375% comes to $71,250. Same hypothetical price, more than double the assessment, and no city government collecting it.
The gap isn't just size. It's who holds the pen. Vail's RETT sits under a public ordinance a resident can amend at the ballot box, at least in theory. Beaver Creek's RETA funds a private organization whose staff work under contract to a corporation, not a town payroll. The Resort Company employs a Managing Director who reports to its board, and its ten staff members are provided under a management agreement with Vail Resorts, which handles accounting, budgeting and planning for a fixed fee. The organization itself dates to 1979, when it incorporated as a Colorado nonprofit designed to help Beaver Creek become and remain a unique resort community, vested with a wide range of responsibilities and authority to manage property for the common benefit of owners and businesses within Beaver Creek.
None of that makes the assessment illegitimate. It funds real things: marketing, village security, the shuttle system, architectural review through a Design Review Board. But it means the number a buyer sees on a closing statement in Beaver Creek didn't come from a public hearing the way Vail's did. It came from a private board setting a private rate, and the only place to verify it before you're at the closing table is the Resort Company's own assessments page.
Once you set the fee against other Colorado resort towns, the shape of the surprise gets clearer. Most incorporated mountain towns land at 1%.
| Town | Local Transfer Rate | Who Collects It |
|---|---|---|
| Vail | 1% | Town of Vail (government) |
| Breckenridge, Frisco, Gypsum, Minturn, Snowmass Village, Winter Park | 1% each | Respective town governments |
| Beaver Creek Village | 2.375% | Beaver Creek Resort Company (private) |
| Aspen | 1.5% total | City of Aspen (government) |
| Telluride | 3% | Town of Telluride (government) |
Breckenridge, Frisco, Gypsum, Minturn, Snowmass Village, Vail, and Winter Park each charge 1%. Aspen's 1.5% is actually two taxes stacked together, a 0.5% tax funding the Wheeler Opera House and a 1% tax funding affordable housing, with the first $100,000 of consideration excluded from the housing portion. Telluride charges 3%, dedicated to capital improvements, open space, and reserve funds. Beaver Creek Village's 2.375% sits above every government-run 1% town on that list and closer to Aspen's combined rate, despite Beaver Creek having no government at all to justify it with a public budget vote.
For scale, Colorado's own statewide charge barely registers next to any of this. The state documentary fee is just 0.01% of the sale price, or roughly ten cents per hundred dollars. The local resort assessments are the entire ballgame.
Beaver Creek Resort is actually three gated villages, Beaver Creek Village, Bachelor Gulch, and Arrowhead, and the Resort Company's published rate sheet covers the resort as a whole without breaking the number out by village. That's less reassuring than it sounds, because Bachelor Gulch and Arrowhead each carry their own separate governmental layer on top of it. Both operate as independently registered metropolitan districts. The Bachelor Gulch Metropolitan District files its own annual transparency notice with the Special District Association of Colorado, and Arrowhead Metropolitan District appears as its own member entity, distinct from Beaver Creek Metropolitan District, in the Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority's list of the districts it serves.
What that means in practice: a buyer comparing a ski chalet in Bachelor Gulch against a condo in Beaver Creek Village isn't just comparing architecture and privacy. They're comparing properties that sit inside different special districts with different governing boards, even if both fall under the same Resort Company assessment umbrella. Confirming exactly which district and which assessments apply to a specific parcel, not just the resort's overall brand, has to happen before an offer goes in.
Buyers planning to rent their Beaver Creek property short-term run into a second layer that has nothing to do with the sale itself. A Civic Assessment of 5.35% applies to total sales and short-term rental nights, and a Lodging Civic Assessment of 0.96% applies specifically to rental income from stays under thirty days. Owners who rent their home or condominium are required to pay both the Civic Assessment and the Lodging Civic Assessment to BCRC, and any rental under thirty days counts as a short-term stay triggering both. If a management company handles the unit, they'll typically collect and remit these on the owner's behalf, but the obligation still sits with the owner to confirm it's happening.
For a buyer weighing Beaver Creek against Vail purely as a rental investment, this is worth running the math on before closing, not after the first booking season.
The pattern across all of this is the same. Beaver Creek's costs are real, they're higher than what a Vail closing prepares you for, and none of them live on a page a title search automatically surfaces the way a municipal ordinance does. Before writing an offer in Beaver Creek Village, Bachelor Gulch, or Arrowhead, confirm three things directly with the title company or the relevant district office: the current RETA percentage for that specific parcel, whether the sale qualifies for the zero-consideration exemption paperwork, and whether the property's rental plans trigger the Civic and Lodging Civic Assessments on top of everything else. None of these numbers are secret. They're just not where a buyer coming from a government-run market thinks to look.
Does Vail's InDeed program change the math for a deed-restricted property? It can. Deed-restricted unit sales in Vail are exempt from the town's real estate transfer tax, and Vail InDEED was created specifically to incentivize owners and buyers to deed restrict property, in support of the town's goal of adding 1,000 deed-restricted units by 2027. Beaver Creek's private RETA doesn't carry an equivalent exemption path tied to workforce housing goals, since it isn't a municipal program.
Is the Beaver Creek transfer assessment negotiable between buyer and seller? The rate itself is fixed by the Resort Company, but who pays it at closing is a contract term like any other closing cost, and it should be spelled out explicitly rather than assumed.
Does the 2.375% RETA apply the same way in Bachelor Gulch and Arrowhead? The Resort Company's published rate covers Beaver Creek Resort broadly, but Bachelor Gulch and Arrowhead each sit inside their own separate metropolitan district on top of that. Confirm with the title company which district and which assessments apply to the specific parcel rather than assuming one number covers the whole resort.
If you're weighing a purchase or a sale anywhere across Beaver Creek Village, Bachelor Gulch, or Arrowhead and want the real numbers run before you write an offer, Kevin Kuebert has spent years working through exactly this kind of fine print with buyers and sellers across the Vail Valley. Let's Connect.
Stay up to date on the latest real estate trends.
Partner with Kevin for expert guidance in buying or selling real estate in the Vail Valley. His experience and integrity ensure a smooth and successful process. Contact Kevin to start your real estate journey!